Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong believe that a gradual mind shift and important community contributions led to their backing of Ethereum’s upcoming move from a proof-of-work (PoW) to proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus.
The two industry titans joined Coinbase protocol specialist Viktor Bunin on the Around the Block podcast for an enlightening discussion centered on The Merge, which is set to take place in mid-September 2022.
Buterin reflected on his history of considering proof-of-stake as a potential consensus mechanism for the Ethereum blockchain, which was initially met with skepticism due to a number of unsolved problems that made it seemingly unviable.
According to the Ethereum co-founder, one of his the project’s first blog posts in 2014 proposed an algorithm called slasher which introduced the concept wherein a node would be penalized for voting for contradicting actions:
“This was my attempt at making inroads in solving what proof-of-stake critics call the ‘nothing-at-stake’ problem. In proof-of-work if you want to build on top of two blocks you have to do double the work but in proof-of-stake you can just sign as many things as you want.”
Buterin believed that introducing an explicit penalty for signing contradictory actions would be a viable option. Research continued through 2014 to explore the security assumptions that Ethereum would have to rely on with PoS and if it could be more secure than PoW by making slashing penalties eat into staked deposits rather than staking rewards.
Buterin then reflected on a concept introduced at the end of that year called “weak subjectivity.” He explained that in order for a PoS network to benefit from the full security guarantee of the mechanism, a node has to be online at fairly regular intervals.
This could be every week, month, or year, with longer time periods becoming more inconvenient for stakers from a liquidity perspective. Buterin believes this was the critical consideration that set his mind on the transition to PoS:
“Ironically enough for me, it was realising that that was an unavoidable tradeoff that actually made me comfortable with it. It made me realise that this is the weakness and at the same time I felt confident that it’s all that there is.”
Armstrong entered the conversation, admitting that he had reservations about PoS when he first heard about it and it took a couple of years to change his perspective:
“When people started talking about a Turing complete language on a blockchain, I was like this sounds so easy to attack and so I was initially just skeptical.”
The Coinbase CEO began to explore the concept again after explaining that his initial belief that Bitcoin would serve as the main blockchain in the ecosystem had its limitations. The success of decentralized applications (Dapps) running on Ethereum led Armstrong to have a more open mind around the transition to PoS:
“Just seeing Vitalik make progress on it and the Dapps that were coming out, we eventually came round to the idea at Coinbase that we’re going to have to be agnostic to every chain and token that is coming out, we can’t sit here in our ivory tower only focused on one asset.”
Buterin went on to unpack his belief that PoS is more robust and decentralized than PoW, with the ability for an Ethereum validator to be set up anywhere in the world. An individual only needs a computer and an internet connection to do so.
The pair also weighed in on the United States Treasury’s move to sanction USD Coin (USDC) and Ether (ETH) addresses connected to Tornado Cash, while also noting that Coinbase would rather stop its staking operation to preserve the integrity of the overall network in the hypothetical situation that it was required to censor transactions.
This article is strictly for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. CryptosOnline.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, business or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused by, or in connection with, the use of or reliance on any content, goods, services or opinions mentioned in this article.
#Bitcoin #Crypto #Cryptocurrency